<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ed Kelley&#8217;s &#8220;Flaming Lips&#8221; Supports the Hammer &amp; Sickle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.okpns.com/2009/04/28/ed-kelleys-flaming-lips-supports-the-hammer-sickle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.okpns.com/2009/04/28/ed-kelleys-flaming-lips-supports-the-hammer-sickle/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:50:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Flaming Lips&#8217; &#8220;Do You Realize??&#8221; To Become Official Rock Song of Oklahoma In Less Than Two Minutes</title>
		<link>http://www.okpns.com/2009/04/28/ed-kelleys-flaming-lips-supports-the-hammer-sickle/comment-page-1/#comment-68992</link>
		<dc:creator>Flaming Lips&#8217; &#8220;Do You Realize??&#8221; To Become Official Rock Song of Oklahoma In Less Than Two Minutes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.okpns.com/2009/04/28/ed-kelleys-flaming-lips-supports-the-hammer-sickle/#comment-68992</guid>
		<description>[...] was then actually blocked by the Oklahoma House of Representatives (allegedly due to the fact that Michael Ivins likes to wear hammer-and-sickle T-shirts) before being overturned by Governor Brad Henry via executive order, which will be signed, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was then actually blocked by the Oklahoma House of Representatives (allegedly due to the fact that Michael Ivins likes to wear hammer-and-sickle T-shirts) before being overturned by Governor Brad Henry via executive order, which will be signed, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.okpns.com/2009/04/28/ed-kelleys-flaming-lips-supports-the-hammer-sickle/comment-page-1/#comment-30013</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 04:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.okpns.com/2009/04/28/ed-kelleys-flaming-lips-supports-the-hammer-sickle/#comment-30013</guid>
		<description>Luckily nobody has ever been killed in the name of religion, Western imperialism, democracy, or in furthering the interests of these United States of America, or your argument about &quot;they killed people therefore their philosophy is bad&quot; as applied to Communism wouldn&#039;t hold much water.

Oh wait, those things have been responsible for more deaths than Communism and the Nazis combined.  Good thing they were in the name of all the things you agree with, though, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luckily nobody has ever been killed in the name of religion, Western imperialism, democracy, or in furthering the interests of these United States of America, or your argument about &#8220;they killed people therefore their philosophy is bad&#8221; as applied to Communism wouldn&#8217;t hold much water.</p>
<p>Oh wait, those things have been responsible for more deaths than Communism and the Nazis combined.  Good thing they were in the name of all the things you agree with, though, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arenap</title>
		<link>http://www.okpns.com/2009/04/28/ed-kelleys-flaming-lips-supports-the-hammer-sickle/comment-page-1/#comment-29370</link>
		<dc:creator>Arenap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.okpns.com/2009/04/28/ed-kelleys-flaming-lips-supports-the-hammer-sickle/#comment-29370</guid>
		<description>Is it really necessary to tear down Ed Kelley&#039;s physical appearance, even if you disagree with him? Why not argue with him on the merits, instead of immature shots at his haircut and manner of speech? 

This is stooping to Keith Olbermann tactics, it&#039;s precisely the kind of nonsense unhinged leftists engaged in the past eight years, and it just makes you look bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it really necessary to tear down Ed Kelley&#8217;s physical appearance, even if you disagree with him? Why not argue with him on the merits, instead of immature shots at his haircut and manner of speech? </p>
<p>This is stooping to Keith Olbermann tactics, it&#8217;s precisely the kind of nonsense unhinged leftists engaged in the past eight years, and it just makes you look bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.okpns.com/2009/04/28/ed-kelleys-flaming-lips-supports-the-hammer-sickle/comment-page-1/#comment-29347</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.okpns.com/2009/04/28/ed-kelleys-flaming-lips-supports-the-hammer-sickle/#comment-29347</guid>
		<description>I agree with Ed Kelley&#039;s video.  But it&#039;s beside the point.  Any publication with a speck of journalistic merit would have argued against the validity of his video, not just chastising Kelley as a person.  How juvenile!  It makes your shots at Kelley look weak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Ed Kelley&#8217;s video.  But it&#8217;s beside the point.  Any publication with a speck of journalistic merit would have argued against the validity of his video, not just chastising Kelley as a person.  How juvenile!  It makes your shots at Kelley look weak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.okpns.com/2009/04/28/ed-kelleys-flaming-lips-supports-the-hammer-sickle/comment-page-1/#comment-29234</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.okpns.com/2009/04/28/ed-kelleys-flaming-lips-supports-the-hammer-sickle/#comment-29234</guid>
		<description>As I see it, the big problem for the Lips is their name - that&#039;s what turned so many conservative legislators against them.

Flaming.

The gay connotation was just too much for the strictly trained conservatives to deal with.  

Perhaps the band could change the &quot;Flaming&quot; part to something else.

As for Ed Kelley - He&#039;s a non-entity saying words with no meaning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I see it, the big problem for the Lips is their name &#8211; that&#8217;s what turned so many conservative legislators against them.</p>
<p>Flaming.</p>
<p>The gay connotation was just too much for the strictly trained conservatives to deal with.  </p>
<p>Perhaps the band could change the &#8220;Flaming&#8221; part to something else.</p>
<p>As for Ed Kelley &#8211; He&#8217;s a non-entity saying words with no meaning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
